<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Code Review</title><link>https://blog.ast.moe/en/tags/code-review/</link><description>Recent posts: Gorimuchu</description><generator>Hugo</generator><item><title>Stance on AI Coding and Code Reviews</title><link>https://blog.ast.moe/en/blog/2026-09-25-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:23:11 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://blog.ast.moe/en/blog/2026-09-25-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When it comes to AI coding, I think we should freely use any technology that works. Both the speed of implementation and the number of ideas we can try have changed dramatically compared to when humans wrote all the code themselves. Tasks that were once measured in hours can now be completed in a short amount of time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, just because more code is being generated doesn’t mean humans can review it at the same pace. Trying to keep the cycle going with “if AI writes a lot, humans must read a lot” is unsustainable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>